|
|
Amortizing Advances
In the current interest-rate environment, our customers’ margins
are being squeezed—more and more everyday—and the all-important
“net interest spread” is harder and harder to come by. Since
margins are the key driver of financial performance for most financial
institutions, it’s no wonder to us that our customers are working
diligently to maintain their margins—by improving their yields on
earning assets and/or reducing the cost of interest bearing liabilities.
Here on the funding desk, we can offer some great ideas to help with
the funding side of your business. Because most of you are familiar with
the array of funding products offered by the Seattle Bank, we won’t
present the intricacies of all our products in this article. Instead,
we’ll focus on one of our more underused funding products: the amortizing
advance.
The amortizing advance sees little use relative to our other advance
products. As a proportion of our advance portfolio, amortizing advances
make up about 5%. When properly applied, however, it is one of the more
dynamic and useful advance products we offer.
The Product
The amortizing advance is a fixed-rate advance with a predetermined schedule
of principal cash flows that must be paid over the life of the advance—and
that is exactly what gives this advance its advantage. Before we look
at some examples of how you might use this advance product, however, let’s
discuss its mechanics.
There are basically two types of amortizing advances. They differ based
on how their cash flow payments are structured. The “straight-line”
advance, as the name implies, amortizes the principal in equal payments
due each month during the life of the advance. (Interest is also due monthly.)
For example, an advance with a four-year final maturity, amortized using
the straight-line method, will have a weighted average life of two years.
The “customized” amortizing advance basically encompasses
all the structures that don’t fall into the straight-line category.
These can range from an advance with a level-pay amortization schedule,
to an advance with a lockout period followed by a schedule of principal
payments. The flexibility in structure is one of the most important benefits
of the amortizing advance. Unfortunately, it is also one of the most overlooked.
Match Funding
One key way to take advantage of the product’s flexibility is to
use it to match-fund, or hedge, asset transactions. Here’s an example.
Let’s say you’re making a loan to a customer, and you want
to hedge the transaction by matching it with a liability with similar
cash flows. If your customer is looking to take down a five-year, fully
amortizing commercial loan, you are not going to fund the asset with a
five-year liability. Why? A five-year commercial loan has a duration somewhere
close to four years. In this case, a customized amortizing advance can
be created to closely match the cash flows of the loan, thus providing
a good duration-match for the asset. After all, it’s not the final
maturities that are important to match; it’s the duration of the
asset and the liability that you need to focus on.
Let’s look another example. Assume your customer is looking for
a commercial loan with an amortization schedule of 20 years and a balloon
payment at the end of the fifth year. You want to match fund this loan
through the Seattle Bank, but can’t find an advance to match the
term. In this case, we can create a customized amortizing advance with
an amortization period of 20 years and a final maturity of five years.
The advance structure will closely match the duration of the loan, thus
providing a good funding vehicle, assuming match funding is the strategy
you choose.
Duration and the Current Yield Curve
As we all know, duration represents a measure of the present values of
cash flows, weighted by their term. An amortizing advance will always
have a shorter duration than a bullet advance. The reason for this, of
course, is the occurrence of principal cash flows over the term of the
amortizing advance. In the current flat yield-curve environment, the decision
to use amortizing advances can be muddled by comparing them to bullet
advances.
Consider a five-year bullet advance and a five-year customized (level
pay) amortizing advance. Due to the flatness in the yield curve, these
two advance rates provide the borrower with similar interest rates on
their borrowings. For example, the five-year bullet priced around 4.48%,
while the five-year, level-pay amortizing advance priced at a rate of
4.55%. At the same time, these two advance products provide the borrower
with dissimilar durations (again, the bullet will have a longer duration).
Why would you pay a similar rate for a liability with less duration?
The answer lies in the structure of the product. If a borrower is strictly
out to buy duration, then the bullet structure is obviously the way to
go. But, with the possibility of an inverted yield curve on the horizon,
is extending the duration of your liabilities a priority? Also, remember
that advance values do not behave like fixed-income investments when “rolling
down the curve.” With the bond market ever harder to predict, extending
the duration of term borrowings may not be your priority—even though
your instinct tells you interest rates are going up. The shorter-duration
advance with cash flows may bear some consideration in this environment.
1 A small
factor in the current similarity in rates is the fact the Seattle Bank
adds on a small amount of extra spread to amortizing advances due to higher
hedging costs.
2 “Rolling Down the Curve” is commonly used to
refer to a fixed income security’s property of increasing in market
value as time passes (assuming a positively sloped yield curve). Note
this occurs up to a certain point until market value will peak due to
the shortening of the remaining term to maturity.
Figure 1. Changes in Yield Spreads (%)

Filling a Gap
Another way to use an amortizing advance is to manage predicted deposit
runoff and/or gathering to increase your liability sensitivity. Let’s
say your bank is planning to end one of your deposit specials next week.
After extensive analysis of deposit elasticity, management is forecasting
a $1-million runoff due to rate-sensitive customers moving their funds.
Although you’re not planning to run any specials to attempt to retain
those deposits, you do plan on implementing an aggressive deposit-gathering
strategy 12 months from now to support bank growth.
In this situation, an amortizing advance can help in two ways: (1) to
fill the funding void left by the deposits, and (2) to fund the current
growth of your bank, while maintaining the flexibility to replace the
advance with deposits in the future.
Continuing with the example, let’s assume your bank takes down
a $2-million, four-year, customized amortizing advance with the first
payment occurring in one-year and with equal monthly principal payments
thereafter. The $2 million replaces the $1-million void left by the deposit
runoff, as well as providing $1 million of additional funding. Your strategy
is to replace this wholesale funding with lower cost deposits over the
next several years. The fact that the advance amortizes over three years
allows you to replace the wholesale funding with lower cost deposits incrementally,
over time.
Figure 2. Temporary Funding (Composition of $2mm
in Funding)

Amortizing advances can play an important role in funding your balance
strategies—from general funding to match funding of assets. The
standard pricing for straight-line amortizing advances appears every morning
in the Daily Rate Sheet provided by the Seattle Bank’s Customer
Funding department. If there’s a specific structure you’d
like to have priced, please give us a call at 800.340.3452. We’ll
be happy to help.

For more information, please contact Erick
Rendon at the Seattle Bank.
Printable Version
E-mail this article
 |
|
Newsletter content is for our readers' informational purposes only.
Please refer to our Terms of Use for details. |
|